The culture of the Left, represented by the mainstream segments of media, academia, entertainment, and the Democratic Party, is identified by lawlessness. However, this culture has an extremely legalistic attitude toward what it considers racism, bigotry, and hatred.
Why are exceptions made to condemn these three “unpardonable sins” by those who otherwise allow any and all attitudes and ideas? These appear to not only be unpardonable sins, but the only sins. In the view of the Left, racism, bigotry, and hate are relegated to the lowest level of immorality; more accurately, the only level of immorality.
If there is law and morality, right and wrong, then there must be a source that defines all right and wrong, including racism, bigotry, and hate. If not, then who among us gets to decide what is right and what is wrong? Is it those that say it is right kill a person because the person is not wanted? Can we be directed to what is right and wrong by those that say a man can be a woman and a woman can be a man? Can we be guided to make a right decision by those who take by force what belongs to one, give it to another, and call it welfare? Can we trust those that tell us we can let any and all into our country without being concerned that we will be overwhelmed and that enemies will enter? Do we really want those deciding propriety that deem nakedness or near nakedness to be appropriate public display, and profanity to be acceptable speech? Will we be led on the correct course by those that are intolerant of those that know there is more to right and wrong than racism, bigotry, and hatred?
Could it be that there is not so much prevalence of the “unpardonable sins” as there is an overwhelming abundance of the “acceptable sins”? If there is no source of right and wrong, then racism, bigotry, and hatred are just as acceptable as anything else.
Speak Your Mind